🔬 NEW RESULTS: Empirical evidence of AI cognitive architectures with p < 0.0001 significance View Results →

Hillary Danan

Measuring AI Cognitive Architectures Through Task & Resting-State Neuroscience Methods

630
Responses Analyzed
p<0.0001
Statistical Significance
71.5%
Max Coherence
14
Semantic Dimensions

Bridging Neuroscience & AI

Applying validated task-based and resting-state fMRI methods to understand how AI models process information and reflect on their own cognition

🧠 Dual Framework Approach

Combining quantitative architecture mapping (TIDE-analysis) with metacognitive perception studies (TIDE-resonance) - directly paralleling my PhD work on task-based and resting-state fMRI differences.

Explore 3D Visualization

🔬 Resting-State Parallels

When AI models reflect on their own processing, they exhibit patterns analogous to Default Mode Network activation - providing empirical insight into AI metacognition.

Participate in Study

📊 Measurable Differences

Statistical analysis reveals AI models have distinct cognitive architectures, ranging from high consistency to high variability in response patterns.

Read Scientific Analysis

Latest Research Findings

21 sessions | 630 responses | Highly significant results

AI Model Coherence Score Architecture Type
Gemini 1.5 Flash 71.5% Most consistent/predictable
Claude 3 Haiku 55.1% Moderate variability
GPT-3.5 Turbo 38.3% Most varied/creative
View Live Dashboard

Explore the Research

Open source tools and live demonstrations of AI cognitive architecture analysis

Full Research Portfolio View Code Contact